who used its platform to net victims for their scams). The regulator’s accusation extends to alleging that Meta “aided and abetted or was knowingly concerned in false or misleading conduct and representations by the advertisers” (i.e. Specifically, it alleges Meta’s conduct is in breach of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) or the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act (ASIC Act). The watchdog said today that it’s seeking “declarations, injunctions, penalties, costs and other orders” against the social media giant, accusing it of engaging in “false, misleading or deceptive conduct” by publishing scam advertisements featuring prominent Australian public figures - activity the ACCC asserts breaches local consumer laws. The lawsuit is led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and was joined by the attorneys general of Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, South Dakota and Utah.Australia’s Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has instigated proceedings against Facebook owner Meta for allowing the spread of scam ads on its platforms and - it alleges - not taking sufficient steps to tackle the issue. “We sign hundreds of agreements every year that don’t require CEO approval, and this was no different,” he said, adding that the agreement “was never a secret.” Google's Schottenfels said the lawsuit's allegation that Pichai approved the deal with Facebook "isn't accurate.”
META ORIGINAL REDACTED EMAIL CODE
Internally, Google used the code phrase “Jedi Blue” to refer to the 2018 agreement, according to the lawsuit. “These business relationships enable Meta to deliver more value to advertisers while fairly compensating publishers, resulting in better outcomes for all,” Sgro said. Meta spokesperson Chris Sgro said Friday that the company's ad bidding agreement with Google and similar agreements it has with other bidding platforms “have helped to increase competition for ad placements.”
Sandberg, who was once the head of Google's ad business, and Pichai personally signed off on the deal, per the states' complaint. In September 2018, the complaint says, the two companies signed the agreement. In a statement, Google spokesperson Peter Schottenfels said the lawsuit is “full of inaccuracies and lacks legal merit.” Zuckerberg wanted to meet with Sandberg and his other executives before making a decision, the complaint states. “We’re nearly ready to sign and need your approval to move forward,” the email read, according to the complaint. When the two sides hammered out the terms of the agreement, “the team sent an email addressed directly to CEO” Zuckerberg, the lawsuit states. While the names of the Facebook executives are still redacted in the suit, their titles are visible. Facebook has since renamed itself Meta.Īccording to the lawsuit, Facebook's chief operating officer, Sheryl Sandberg, was “explicit that ‘this is a big deal strategically’" in a 2018 email thread about the deal that included Facebook's CEO. But the unredacted version offers details on the involvement of Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg in approving the deal. The original, redacted lawsuit, filed in December 2021, accused Google of “anti-competitive conduct” and of teaming up with the social networking giant.
The CEOs of both companies were aware of the deal and signed off on it, the lawsuit alleges. NEW YORK (AP) - Newly unredacted documents from a state-led antitrust lawsuit against Google accuse the search giant of colluding with rival Facebook to manipulate online advertising sales.
0 kommentar(er)
